IP SJW cc etc

 IP

I am a white knight, I combat my less than stellar self esteem with an unwavering need to aid others even if they don’t need it (i.e marginalized people, see the rest of my blog to get a glimpse of my white knightliness) 

I believe in the integration between social groups where differences are valued in an environment of solidarity, respect, protection. Every race-ethnicity, nation, people, and human on Earth are equal to each other and have their own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to live wherever they want. There is good and bad in all persons on Earth

I support solidarity and liberation which will lead to a classless society without hierarchy. This is a natural progression. If we need to use Social Patriotism to reach that point of getting to that classless society without a heirarchy, I guess we' need Social Patriotism to do so as a necessary evil. Classes and hierarchies are the main cause of our ills so they must be destroyed. This will liberate bigots from their bigotry and suppress any possible future bigotry

All of the bigoted isms (sexism, racism, heterosexism, nativism, National Chauvinism etc) are clearly repugnant as history has taught us. We have to recognize the state’s role in creating, perpetuating and exploiting these unfair mechanisms while we need to eliminate these state props for prejudices which can make society more free and less unjust toward marginalized people

It is ok that some relationships (like close acquaintances and monogamous relationships) are exclusionary to other people. There is no bright line rule regarding permissible and impermissible exclusion. Ideally (though not a deal breaker), when particular intimate sub communities justifiably exclude someone—for the simple reason that they would cease to be the kinds of communities they are if they weren’t strictly (lime limited in size), there is clearly room for the excluded person in the broader community of which they are components. Ideally they would be welcomed/included there

When justifiable exclusion occurs, it should ideally not reflect false beliefs about or unreasonable reactions to some group of which the excluded person belongs. 

For example, perhaps A acts reasonably in deciding not to marry B because of vital differences in the ways in which B and A understand the nature of marriage, differences that might come to light from B’s membership in a certain group with a traditional view of  marital relationships in a specific way. 

But this is different from A’s deciding not to marry B either because of the fact that certain visible members of B’s group hold marital views even if (1) A does not know that B has those views or (2) B credibly denies having those views or (b) A holds to a prejudice against members of B’s group, like believing that cohabitation with a member of this group would make someone like A unclean.

From my position, I generally oppose exclusion. I make reasonable exceptions only/roughly when they don’t involve exclusion from large and relatively impersonal communities and relationships and only when they are not rooted in false beliefs or unreasonable reactions.

By saying that exclusion is morally objectionable that does not determine what counts as an appropriate solution for morally unjustifiable exclusion. It isn’t helpful or needed to justify exclusion as reasonable or morally appropriate, to be against to the use of physical force to counter exclusion. Though I believe in some rarer cases using physical force to combat exclusion is justifiable if done the right way with an eye for forcing said hierarchal systems to be destroyed quickly

My general views on Identity politics https://www.cpusa.org/article/the-curious-rise-of-white-left-nationalism/ 

I support Civic Nationalism for all American citizens 

I support Post Nationalism

I am Anti Totalitarian 

I am an Egalitarian and I support Egalitarian liberalism

I am very very unsupportive of Fascism, it is fun to bash the fash (and their naughtzie allies). We really should destroy the fascist bourgeoisie (fascists are spooks). :-J Titoism was a great way to deal with Fascists J-:

I support specific European Autonomous-Antifa patriotic groups 

I am patriotic in my own unique way (Grand ole flag and Yankee Doodle Dandy; I loved those songs in kindergarten)

I am ok with New Western Transnationalism (New Western Transnationalism is to Western Transnationalism is what Theodore Roosevelt’s New Nationalism was to Nationalism)

I am ok with Liberal Nationalism

Socialism is better than Nationalism. I support Nationalism being replaced by certain forms of Socialism

Etc

I am against cancel culture (i believe cancel culturers should get a taste of their own medicine)

The IDW generally echo my views on SJW and PC (but in a way that Anthony Scaramuchi would tell them to convey their thoughts toward those things)

I am against censorship

It would be much easier for me to accept Big Tech censorship of ‘far right’ people, groups and views if Big Tech with their unlimited power and money took meaningful action against said extremists proactively and aggressively instead of doing so last minute in a knee jerk way and having to be called to do so by anti far right advocates

I don’t pity or feel sorry at all for right wing victims of censorship since right wingers are hypocrites when it comes to censorship. 

If and when they fight against censorship of left wingers like they do for right wingers then we’ll talk and I’ll change my tune on this. Right Wing SJWs should use trolling to get back at those who cancel their Right Wing allies and to get their point across instead of relying on anti censorship people to come to their rescue and Big Tech platforms to give a voice to their views which attract censorship like honey attracts bees respectively

We need to use trolling and democraticguilt methods that I would approve of to get people into dismantling the racist (by MLK Jr’s definition), social fascist-capitalist, liberal homophobic-liberal transphobic, patriarchies etc

I believe in using those methods (including edgy, inquisitive, with us or against us ways thrown into the mix) to also prevent anti police abuse and disrespect and to build on our traditions (in a multipolar way where we appreciate local and particular, tried and tested, family and community while seeking to to aid the most vulnerable in society while moving beyond the market) to usher in a post traditional society where the ‘next wave’ of new traditions form , while pretending to be nice about the methods we use to achieve this

I am a SJW for gun rights and to rail against some aspects of anti americanism and fiscal views that are anametheic to my fiscal views. 

I am a Left wing version of a Fishhook theory Right Wing adjacent SJW on combating rock music that has rap or lyrics I don’t like (I hated in the 1990s due to Alt Rock), certain aspects of video games (mainstreaming of video games, non family friendly, easy or woke video games etc), ISIS and Al Qaeda not being treated as terrorists, the rarer extreme sects of Islam being anti LGBTQ and non woman friendly, the paganism of China, the troublesome aspects of Pokemon and similar things

We need to use zealous calling in to deal with right wingers we find problematic

I advocate via old school SJW methods, dismantling the racist white cis heteronormative male patriarchy to lead to my idea of a diverse world

I am fine with Right Wingers having safe spaces to admit their right wing views without judgement since it is therapeutic. I am also fine with safe spaces for anti safe space people to use. I am anti safe space myself

There is NOTHING offensive about the 1964 Rudolph Red Nosed Reindeer movie

There is NOTHING offensive or wrong about using these phrases and I want people to use these phrases MORE than they do now just to piss off the extreme fringe left nut speech police: “Don’t cry over spilled milk”, “packed like sardines”, “on a wild goose chase”, “ants in your pants”, “walking on egg shells”, “kill two birds with one stone”, “let the cat out of the bag”, “take the bull by the horns”, “be a guinea pig”, “hold your horses”, “open a can of worms”, “bring home the bacon”, “beat a dead horse”, “put all your eggs in one basket”, “bullpen”

There is nothing offensive about Beverly Hills Cop III

There is NOTHING offensive about the term 'black ice' 

THERE IS NOTHING OFFENSIVE ABOUT BUGS BUNNY EATING CARROTS 

There is nothing offensive about Dune (2021)

There is NOTHING offensive about the Skin Swapping in FEF (3ds)

There is NOTHING offensive about Horton Hears a Who

There is nothing offensive about the game Ice Climbers

There is NOTHING offensive about the way people are portrayed on Disney's Jungle Cruise ride pre 2020s

There is NOTHING offensive about the puking scene in Kingpin where Woody Harrelson's character pukes after having sex with an old lady

There is NOTHING offensive about the Maude tv series

THERE IS NOTHING WRONG with children sitting on the laps of Mall Santas 

There is NOTHING offensive about the Miss Chiquita mascot mentioned in this article https://www.businessinsider.in/advertising/15-racist-brand-mascots-and-logos-that-make-the-redskins-look-progressive/slidelist/36842401.cms#slideid=36842425

THERE IS NOTHING offensive about the Prince kissing Sleeping Beauty while she is sleeping to wake her up. That is not date rape. It is totally inoffensive

There is NOTHING offensive about the scene in Splash where Daryl Hanna's nipple is shown

There is NOTHING offensive about Super Mario Odyssey 

There is nothing offensive about the Golden State Warriors nickname

I want Edy’s Pie to be renamed Intuit Pie

I want the Edmonton Elks to be renamed the Canadiens 

I want the Chicago White Sox to be renamed the Disco Demolishers

I want Oklahoma to get an NFL team and have that team be called the Oklahoma Plains or Oklahoma City  Rivers