Polemic and voting
I am a Left Wing (non American version of Left Wing) , Social Democrat (including Luxemburgism). I support Big Tent politics (i.e the Serve America Movement). I am a member of the Alt Left and supporter of the Democratic Socialists of America (I am not a Democratic Socialist, I just support the party)
I am an American supporter of the Five Star Movemnet and the majority of my political views align with their views
I support the Labour Party UK (current Labour Party UK Social Democracy/some aspects of 2017-2019 Labour Party UK Social Democracy/Momentum/Third Way)
Voting
I would seriously consider being open hearted to bringing back the Articles of the Confederation
I refuse to give my opinion of Donald Trump’ Presidency, because I don’t believe Donald Trump was elected President in the first place (due to Russian interference in the election by Alex Nalvahny, Vladimir Putin etc) thus in my eyes rendering Trump’s ‘Presidency’ invalid.
Since Trump was never officially President due to that cheating, everything he did as ‘President’ is invalid and never happened (sort of like the NCAA retroactively ruling college athletes full who were found to illegally recruited to be ineligible ,rendering all their stats in those retroactively ineligible seasons moot and thus preventing any future analysis of those players retractive ineligible seasons moot since its like they never played during those seasons)
The Democrats and Joe Biden did not steal the 2020 Presidential election from Donald Trump… since as I wrote above, I don’t consider Donald Trump’s junta as valid so since in my eyes, Trump was never President, he couldn’t have had the election stolen from him(since he was never President in the first place)
But I hate everything Donald Trump has done since early 2021 and I think he should find a new line of work and stay out of politics
We have to become a direct and participatory democracy so the electorate decides on policy initiatives without elected representatives as proxies and which citizens participate individually and directly in political decisions and policies that affect their lives. This will make the need or desire to protest almost non existent as people will cause most of their political needs and wants implemented through direct and participatory democracy.
I support repealing sore loser laws
Acts
To quote Betrand Russell on freedom of speech “ The fundamental argument for freedom of opinion is the doubtfulness of all our belief... when the State intervenes to ensure the indoctrination of some doctrine, it does so because there is no conclusive evidence in favour of that doctrine .. It is clear that thought is not free if the profession of certain opinions make it impossible to make a living” and "'Free thought' means thinking freely ... to be worthy of the name freethinker he must be free of two things: the force of tradition and the tyranny of his own passions.”
I am glad that I am part Anarchist. I support my Anarchist allies from all diverse backgrounds
No philosophy or ideology is the final arbiter of truth
I believe that force alone makes something just which is why I am glad when I see ultra liberal changes made through force as opposed through hollow, tone deaf ‘state liberal democratic’ methods like petitions, saviorism, boycotts, peaceful protests and similar vanilla methods. If something is truly just it is worth forcing it into our paradigm. If people want change FORCE it, that is bada@ss and more tasteful to me. Be the change you seek
I support the common good
I support social justice
I support grass-roots empowerment and e-democracy, and direct democracy. The more hands on Americans are with politics, the more this can be realized “ I believe that the government/state should stay out of enforcing moral changes in most to nearly all situations. Moral evolution can happen many times apart of the government/state and relations between people can emerge with freedom from the government/state. Most relationships in life should not be characterized as conflict as the left and right might have it. It's good to have mutual and humane respect for others as individuals. It's also good to do positive and unselfish things without having to grapple with the political ramifications of doing those positive things. ”
We need a new radical development model where the value of work is central to that model which coexists in harmony with the environment
Politicians need to have a presence in social organizations and be among the people
I support protecting civil liberties. The state is a foe to our civil liberties and the best way to safeguard our civil liberties is to protect each other’s control over our bodies and justly acquired possessions
Decision making should be decentralized. I support decentralization. People should be able to fully participate in shaping decisions that are relevant to their lives. But this should only occur via secure pre political rights, all associations should be consensual . Decision makers who use a forcible top down approach are likely to have their decisions tainted by their fallibility due to their self interest motives at the expense of the public.
This is why small sized political units (maybe even radically localized ones), are humanizing but decentralization here means localized down to the level of the individual person
The problem with modern Democrats, Liberals and Progressives is they cannot be relied on to defeat Neoliberalism and Capitalism due to their interests more aligning with those systems than with other systems
Our government, media etc seeks to divide us and pit us against each other to distract us from their uniparty corruption , power and self interests. We need to unite in a Big Tent and bring government back to the people. I support real direct democracy
I champion diversity and protecting people’s inalienable right to pursue their version of the American dream without questions or interference
To quote William Mckinley “our differences are policies our agreements are principals”
We need to revive the authentic liberalism from the 19th century with younger and more modern traits and liberal cultural values that make more sense in these contemporary times
bias
Paul Sperry should not have been suspended from Twitter for his Tweets in August 2022. Suspending Sperry for those tweets is political suppression, censorship, fascist, and goes against his freedom of speech. Sperry did not tweet anything wrong or ban able. Twitter now bans anyone who speaks out against its narrative. We have to stop these social media fascists. #freedomofspeech
Liberal bias: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AReliable_sources%2FPerennial_sources&diff=prev&oldid=1058700530
Groupthink is one of the worst parts of the human psyche and we should guard against it , whether it is in politics, business, holidays etc. From David French "With a striking empirical regularity, deliberation tends to move groups, and the individuals who compose them, toward a more extreme point in the direction indicated by their own predeliberation judgments. In plain English, this means that when like-minded people gather, their views get more extreme. Our arguments reinforce one another to such an extent that the entire group will sometimes become more extreme than the most extreme person at the start of the deliberation"
I fully agree with Vaush https://archive.ph/Ygbzk
I am against revisionism
Facts don’t matter when there is justice to be had
party position/roles
I am anti establishment and I feel our unfair society needs some insurrection
The Republicans of the 1950s, 1960s and early 1970s were a GREAT political party and I am fine with that incarnation of them. In particular the Rockefeller Republicans and Richard Nixon, who actually had some Progressive traits. https://www.wsj.com/articles/richard-nixon-progressive-president-epa-title-ix-detente-cancer-desegregation-11636671414
People on both sides have a common tendency to exaggerate the viewpoints of their ideological opponents. They usually see on average, twice as much difference as actually exists.
There are also imagined extremism. This comes in a via conflicts over abortion rights, the interpretation of a racial-ethnic incident, the attitudes of certain social viewpoints etc
In disputes on politics, everyone seriously overestimates the polarization between both sides. This is due to demonization by each side toward the other
Mark Twain said it best "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect"
'If You Are Not a Liberal When You Are Young, You. Have No Heart, and If You Are Not a Conservative. When Old, You Have No Brain
I don’t really believe in moral relativism
I support respect for human rights and tolerance
Every policy and major government initiative in the US were NOT and are NOT for the purposes of maintaining White supremacy (at least since the early 1970s). Anyone who says otherwise is a deluded anti white conspiracy theorist nut who hates the US
Bad apples
I egalitarianally support equality of authority, since I feel there is no natural right to rule, that non-consensual authority is presumptively illegitimate and state authority is non-consensual.
I believe that the commitment to the type of moral equality which underlies belief in equality of authority should also entail the rejection of subordination and exclusion on the basis of nationality, gender, race, sexual orientation, workplace status, or other irrelevant characteristics.
While I feel that people’s decisions to avoid associating with others because of such characteristics should not be interfered with aggressively, I also feel that such decisions can often still be subjected to moral critique and should be opposed using non-aggressive means. More on non aggressive resistance here
I support social, peaceful, voluntary cooperation. While I feel that force might justly be used only in response to aggression, peaceful and voluntary cooperation is a moral ideal with implications that go beyond simple non-aggression. I feel that associations of all kinds should be structured in ways that affirm the freedom, dignity, and individuality of all participants. This should and would allow participants the option not only of exit but also of voice—of influencing the associations’ trajectories and exercising as much individual discretion within them as possible.
I believe in a fair society, but we can't get it through neo/liberal democracy. Neo/liberal democracy is built against us
So called liberals and progressives are sick, twisted trolls for swatting conservative commentators. If this was the other way around there would be public outcry over it . We need to taje these attempted murderers and thrown in prison for a very long time https://www.drewberquist.com/2022/04/stew-peters-home-gets-swatted-as-part-of-a-dangerous-hostage-prank/
I believe deradicalization of the hard right is a good idea per https://web.archive.org/web/20210501182024/https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/05/01/bunkerchan-deradicalize-online-nazis-4chan-8chan/
I am anti corruption since corruption has caused depressions, recessions, and negative global events for centuries
Neocons and the modern GOP need a ‘free milkshakes’ to knock some sense into them. But the better thing to do would be to unperson Neocons and the modern GOP and erase them from history.
I echo this article https://reason.com/2022/02/08/joe-rogan-and-the-weird-new-definition-of-right-winger/
https://nypost.com/2022/05/22/the-left-targets-people-like-elon-musk-for-not-conforming/ Establishment Democrats and liberals hate anyone who strays from their center left, centrist political plantation. Sam Harris ,Tulsi Gabbard, Joe Rogan, Bret Weinstein are NOT right wing. Over 70 percent of Americans , Australians, Europeans and Canadians are further to the right of Sam Harris, Tulsi Gabbard, Joe Rogan and Bret Weinstein. Maybe instead of those bad apple Democrats demonizing their fellow Democrats who don’t pass their purity tests, they should instead go after the Center left extremists in their own party for pushing people further right. I echo what Tim Dillion said on this matter
The newsspeak words labeled “uninformed opinions" or "misinformation" are terms used by so called progressives, liberals and leftists nowadays when someone has a different opinion then they have. It is the same way they call any BIPOC/lgbtq person with moderate or conservativish views a "grifter". They just cant deal with the fact that people/people on their side think differently.
I am against Donald Trump using federal force on protestors in Portland in 2020 , especially for libertarian reasons
Comments
Post a Comment